审美自反性与阐释学转向——拉什对自反性现代化理论的审美批判Aesthetic Reflexivity and the Hermeneutic Turn:Lash's Aesthetic Critique of Reflexive Modernization Theory
谢静
摘要(Abstract)：
贝克与吉登斯的自反性现代化理论有着广泛的学术影响，但他们的论述囿于理性监控与系统调节，导致了对现代社会中日益弥漫的不确定性与文化多元性的忽视。拉什重构了自反性现代化理论，将现代主体由“监控者”重塑为“阐释者”，把自反性的重心从对风险的概率计算转向在意义流动中持续展开的阐释实践，认为自反性还蕴含着审美维度的批判潜能与本体论意义。在信息社会的符号经济背景下，拉什接纳模仿性符号与感性经验，并借助康德的判断力批判、布尔迪厄的惯习论和泰勒的伦理观，将审美提升至存在论高度，实现了从“怀疑阐释学”向“挽救阐释学”的范式跃迁。这一转向确立了“认知—审美—阐释”交织的主体生成模式，不仅破除了理性主义的技术控制幻觉，更为诊断当下的算法治理困境与主体性危机提供了关键的批判参照。
关键词(KeyWords)： 拉什;自反性现代化;审美维度;阐释学转向;主体性建构
基金项目(Foundation):
作者(Author): 谢静
参考文献(References)：
- (1)Beck, U.&Giddens, A.&Lash, S., Reflexive Modernization:Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order, Stanford University Press, 1994:120.
- (2)Steven Lukes,??mile Durkheim, His Life and Work, Penguin, 1975:4.
- (3)Scott Lash, Reflexive Modernization:The Aesthetic Dimension, Theory Culture Society, vol.10, 1993:1.
- (1)Beck, U.&Giddens, A.&Lash, S., Reflexive Modernization:Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order, Stanford University Press, 1994:119.
- (2)Beck, U.&Giddens, A.&Lash, S., Reflexive Modernization:Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order, Stanford University Press, 1994:127.
- (3)Beck, U.&Giddens, A.&Lash, S., Reflexive Modernization:Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order, Stanford University Press, 1994:128.
- (4)Zygmunt Bauman,"The Solution as Problem", Review of Ulrich Beck, Risk Society:Towards a New Modernity, Times Higher Education Supplement, no.1045, 1992:25; Zygmunt Bauman, Liquid Modernity, Polity Press, 2000.
- (5)Beck, U.&Giddens, A.&Lash, S., Reflexive Modernization:Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order, Stanford University Press, 1994:121.
- (1)Beck, U.&Giddens, A.&Lash, S., Reflexive Modernization:Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order, Stanford University Press, 1994:144.
- (2)Lash, S.&Urry, J., Economies of Signs and Space, SAGE Publications, 1994:4.
- (1)Beck, U.&Giddens, A.&Lash, S., Reflexive Modernization:Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order, Stanford University Press, 1994:135.
- (2)新部落主义（Neotribalism）是一个社会学概念，由法国社会学家米歇尔·马费索利（Michel Maffesoli）在《部落时代》（Le temps des tribus, 1988）中首次提出。它认为人类本质上是从部落社会而非大众社会演化而来的，因此人们会自然地构建起各类社会网络，形成所谓“新部落”。
- (3)Beck, U.&Giddens, A.&Lash, S., Reflexive Modernization:Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order, Stanford University Press, 1994:135.
- (4)Friedrich Nietzsche,??ber Wahrheit und Luge im aussermoralischen Sinne, Nachgelassene Schriften, 1870—1873, Nietzsche Werke III, 2, de Gruyter, 1973:376-384.
- (1)Beck, U.&Giddens, A.&Lash, S., Reflexive Modernization:Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order, Stanford University Press, 1994:136.
- (2)在本雅明的语境中，“Allegorie”是一种观察世界的方式和历史哲学视角。在其《德意志悲苦剧的起源》（Ursprung des deutschen Trauerspiels）一书中，“Allegorie”是以徽章、图像、物体的形式出现的，强调的是具有意义的图像，即“寓像”。在拉什的语境中，当代社会的符号（Sign）往往也是脱离了原始叙事的孤立“图像”，这与“寓像”的内涵高度一致。
- (3)Walter Benjamin, Ursprung des deutschen Trauerspiels, Suhrkamp, 1972:145.
- (1)Beck, U.&Giddens, A.&Lash, S., Reflexive Modernization:Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order, Stanford University Press, 1994:149.
- (2)犹太传统的拉比注释与阐释学，构成了犹太教信仰、律法与文化的基石。其核心理念在于文本的多义性与神圣性，认为《圣经》字句蕴含的无限深意促成了从字面直译到哲理玄想的丰富注释体系。
- (3)Zygmunt Bauman, Modernity and Ambivalence, Polity Press, 1991:55-78.
- (1)Charles Taylor, Philosophical Papers, Cambridge University Press, 1985:45-76.
- (2)Immanuel Kant, Kritik der Urteilskraft, Felix Meiner Verlag, 1922:134-182.
- (1)Zygmunt Bauman, Modernity and Ambivalence, Polity Press, 1991:173.
- (2)参见皮埃尔·布尔迪厄：《区分：判断力的社会批判》（上），刘晖译，商务印书馆2015年版，第385—401页。
- (3)Lash, S.&Urry, J., Economies of Signs and Space, SAGE Publications, 2002:153-155.